George Hunka describes William Gaddis's course at Bard College, 1979: The Literature of Failure |
|
The
Literature of Failure was scheduled for late Wednesday afternoon – two
hours, once a week (Gaddis, I learned later, would take a midday train
up from his home, teach the seminar, sleep over in a guest bedroom -- it
could have been La Farge’s, if I remember correctly -- then finish up with
his prose workshop the next day). There were about twelve
students in the class, and few of us were familiar with Gaddis and so
didn’t know what to expect. He showed up for the first class in what would be his usual outfit -- a corduroy jacket (usually tan), a necktie, very much what a middle-aged college literature professor might be expected to wear in 1979. Gaddis was not a very tall man, perhaps 5'8" or 5'9" at the outside, with sandy blonde hair slowly turning to white and a craggy, lined face. His voice, a reedy, raspy drawl fed by years of cigarettes, brought to mind a more cosmopolitan W.C. Fields. (The cigarettes were a constant presence. During the first class, Gaddis announced that he smoked and suggested that we other smokers go down and sit at his end of the table, where there was an open window with some ventilation for the relief of non-smokers.) The
structure of the class was fairly simple -- a dozen books, one a week, with
two short papers through the semester and a final long paper due in
December. The reading list itself was extraordinary, ranging over the
whole field of contemporary popular culture. The first assignment was
Frederick Exley’s A Fan’s Notes,
which Gaddis thought a masterpiece of a kind. There was also Buried
Alive, a biography of Janis Joplin; Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle; Doris Kearns Goodwin’s psychobiography of Lyndon
Johnson; and, most memorably, Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People, which we students took
care to hide from our fellow classmates lest they get the wrong idea.
(Or, given the gawky apprehensiveness of most kids our age, lest they get
the right idea.) Gaddis assigned us no readings from any of his own
work, though there were great gobs of both novels he’d completed by then
that would have made appropriate reading for the class. This was the
only time in my entire academic career when a teacher did not assign his own
work as required reading. The
class itself was an exploration of the ideas of success and failure in
American culture -- whether failures in one peculiar American sense were
successes in some broader way. Gaddis
himself would ruefully punctuate our discussions on occasion with anecdotes
from his own ambiguous career. One of the ongoing anecdotal themes of
the class was the interest a British television company had evinced in
producing a miniseries version of JR. Week after week, Gaddis would start the class with some
mordantly pessimistic comment on the continuing negotiations over the film
rights. This
was however about as personal as Gaddis ever became about either his work or
his life. He conducted the class around the themes of our study,
not around himself. The broad knowledge evidenced in The
Recognitions and JR was also
evident in the classroom. We students would show up for our
Wednesday sessions with a notebook and a copy of the book we’d been
assigned; Gaddis would show up with these too, but he’d also carry in his
leather satchel another dozen dog-eared, worn books, which he’d pile on
the seminar table in front of him. He referred to them frequently
during the discussion, reading out appropriate excerpts. We
always called him “Mr. Gaddis” -- I don’t think there was ever any
question of us calling him by his first name, after the fashion of so many
professors of the period -- but despite that his conversation during the
classes was relaxed, full of good humor and respectful, sometimes more
respectful than a callow 17-year-old deserves. He didn’t make any
effort to pretend that his own conclusions were gospel or laws from on high,
and, like all good teachers in my experience, would never interrupt a
student in the midst of discourse, no matter how irrelevant or sometimes
sadly misinformed that discourse was. He reserved his impatience and
vitriol for those parts of the American experience he thought stupid and
idiotic. And he didn’t mince words here, either; his own growlings
would often include phrases like “insanely stupid” and “completely
idiotic.” |
|
_________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
William Gaddis on his teaching at Bard College: "My friend William Burroughs used to say that he didn't teach creative writing, he taught creative reading. That was my idea in the Bard Courses I taught, especially "The Theme of Failure in American Literature," where we read everything from Dale Carnegie's How to Win Friends and Influence People to William James' Pragmatism to Diary of a Mad Housewife. What I was trying to do was raise questions for which there are not distinct answers. The problems remain with us because there are no absolutes." Gaddis originally wrote two additional sentences: "Keeping the questions open, as I did at Bard, is a difficult way to teach; it's not like teaching mathematics. This puts a great deal of responsibility directly on the teacher's shoulders." -- from the Bard College Bulletin, November 1984, quoted by Steven Moore in his William Gaddis (Twayne United States Authors Series), pp. 112 and 151. He also includes a list of some of Gaddis's assigned reading for his courses on p. 10: Looking Backward, Edward Bellamy Sister Carrie and An American Tragedy, Theodore Dreiser The Jungle, Upton Sinclair Babbitt, Sinclair Lewis "Provide, Provide," Robert Frost Death of a Salesman, Arthur Miller The Catcher in the Rye, J.D. Salinger Play It As It Lays, Joan Didion Diary of a Mad Housewife, Sue Kaufman A Fan's Notes, Frederick Exley Pragmatism, William James How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie Social Darwinism in American Thought, Richard Hofstadter The Lonely Crowd, David Riesman How Children Fail, John Holt |
|